DECRYPTING THE BIBLE
​
Above all, Jadeists are Free Thinkers in their quest for truth, distinguished by their ability to remain open-minded while formulating original thoughts. In The Craft one is tested by the tools of the trade. In The Temple one is tried by The Light, for no book can illustrate the intricacies of politics as effectively as the Bible when it’s been proficiently analyzed. So, again, emphasis must be placed on how imperative it is that the readers possess in their library dictionaries on Egyptian Hieroglyphics; because the Bible contain words of indispensable importance, transliterated directly from the Egyptian language. We need you to fully understand them. To be qualified to participate in the dissemination of this NEW KNOWLEDGE. For ours is an Intellectual Revolution. A coordinated effort to introduce a New Age of Enlightenment.
“The first revolution is when you change your mind about how you look at things, and see there might be another way to look at it that you have not been shown.”
- Gil Scott Heron -
After meticulous examination, we have concluded that The Bible is a convoluted collection of official, Egyptian records that have been misappropriated and altered to conceal their true authorship. Theft and fraud were perpetrated. Therefore, a proper investigation to determine “when”, and “where” the deed was committed can correctly be called a forensic one. You find yourself faced with the challenge of tracing elusive patterns of narrative, deviously stitched in the fabric of time; with an additional objective of discovering the hand(s) by which they were wrought. It is a daunting task: separating all the disparate elements that constitute this mass of confusion; eliminating redundant and irrelevant details; reediting the narrative as reliably as possible to its original content. But the contradictions persist. It appears that in-coherency has been deliberately contrived into an ingenious paradox of encryption utilizing myth, fiction, truth, transposition, substitution, and propaganda simultaneously. The complexity is compounded by the irony of it having been already encrypted by the original author(s) before being further redacted by subsequent editors and plagiarists.
​
But a clue as to a good place to begin was revealed by Eusebius when he wrote: “He (Moses) was respected by the Egyptian priests, who called him by Thoth’s name.” (Preparatio Evangelicum, 9:27:3-20). What do you suppose was his primary source for that statement? Thoth is a Greek name! In other words, the Greeks knew that some of the acts of the Biblical Moses were based upon the biography of a Thoth-mose! The so-called Five Books of Moses are written from at least two narrative perspectives. In effect, there is a Moses (a soldier) who writes about another Moses (a king-general). Both having the same theophoric!
Soldier Ah-Mose(s), son of Ebana
KING Ah-MOSE(S) I
Ahmose son of Ebana holds a special place in ancient Egyptian history. In his autobiography, written on the walls of his tomb in El-Kab, is preserved his eye-witness account of a war of liberation waged by the native Egyptians against foreign overlords described as Hyksos. This war was later removed completely from the Royal Archives by parties still unknown (but if not by the Greeks, then most likely during the Edicts of Emperor Theodosius). Until Ahmose’s tomb was discovered in 1825 A.D., only second-handed reports of this war had survived through the lost writings of Manetho, who was cited as authority by future historians. The autobiography of Ahmose corroborated Manetho’s report and established its veracity on the matter. Bear in mind that we are informed that Manetho was instructed to compile a history of Egypt by either Ptolemy I Soter or Ptolemy II Philadelphos, the latter of whom it is alleged the first translation of the Hebrew Bible into Greek was commissioned. The Ptolemies had access to the Egyptian archives, so they knew of the Hyksos expulsion! And they also knew that the archives contained no records of a mass Exodus led by a Hebrew named Moses. And what we now know is that, whatever physical evidence existed concerning that war of liberation, it had to be eradicated after Manetho composed his Aegyptiaca (History of Egypt)! Obviously, the culprits had neglected to check the tombs.
Circa 300 years after Manetho, enter Josephus, an avid citer of Manetho. He includes in his Against Apion a claim that rouses the indignation of the Jews to this day. Regarding the Hyksos, Josephus wrote: “He (Manetho) spoke of us.” Italics mine. Anyone who’s familiar with the Biblical Narrative of the Egyptian Captivity knows that, un-like the Hyksos, the ancient Israelites never took control of Lower Egypt for a protracted period of time. We can deduce at least 3 conclusions from Josephus’ statement: (1) The Bible, as we now know it, hadn’t been written when Josephus made that claim, (2) The Bible had been written as we know it, but Josephus didn’t have access to it, or (3) The Bible hadn’t been written at all! But we’ve been taught that the Hebrew Bible was definitely translated into Greek during the reign of Ptolemy II Philadelphos. Therefore, we can strike out option 3 --- IF what we were taught is actually true. However, a 4th option must be taken into consideration: The Hebrew Bible wasn’t translated into Greek, but that a Greek prototype was later translated into Hebrew. Because whoever was responsible for the core structure of the LXX had to have access to official Egyptian records. The Jews never did. The Jadeists endorse option 4! Why? Because our research indicate that the Greeks were aware of Heliopolis being a center of Lunar Theology before it was supplanted by a solar one; thus, also aware that On was associated with Iah through Osiris --- long before the Jews identified Iah as a contraction of Ya-weh. The so-called IN-EFFABLE NAME!
TO BE CONTINUED